You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-2 points

I’m so sick of this nonsense.

Capitalism is the greatest generator of wealth ever created. The problem isn’t the system generating the wealth. The problem is how we DISTRIBUTE the wealth that has been generated.

Any solution that doesn’t recognize that is just ignoring the very clear history of economic systems.

Capitalism sucks, but it’s better than every other economic system ever attempted.

Let’s fix it with Democratic socialism, not burn it down and become the next USSR.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Capitalism is the greatest generator of wealth ever created

I feel like when making that “calculation”, you’ve forgotten to figure in the complete and utter destruction of the biosphere, the impending losses due to climate change, the cost in human lives and well-being and dignity of enslavement, exploitation, and so on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m not, though.

Your conflating an economic system with a lack of regulation. There’s no reason capitalism can’t be regulated properly. The New Deal showed us that it has been in the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Capitalism sucks, but it’s better than every other economic system ever attempted.

this is my favorite argument against thinking about alternatives because it’s so common and is complete nonsense. there’s plenty of room for improvement, and it isn’t as though “the ussr” is the only alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The best capitalist society still imposes a class division between owners and workers. Owners want to maximize profit by paying as little as possible for labor. Workers want to get paid as much as possible for doing the least work.

I am looking for a system where workers gets to keep the value of their labor. Owners lack a place in such a system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I am looking for a system where workers gets to keep the value of their labor. Owners lack a place in such a system.

Why? You can have both owners and profit sharing

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Owners, workers and profit sharing exist under capitalism. Profit sharing is not the same as being an owner due to decision making power and ownership of capital i.e. private property. Workers can benefit from profit sharing, but are excluded from the owners black box for determining profits. The worker keeps their job by producing more value than their labor cost.

I am looking for a system where workers get to make decisions regarding their labor and own the tools by which their labor produces value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

That’s just simply not true. You can go buy some shares of Disney right now, and you’ll see that you get the benefits of being an owner.

It’s a spectrum of how much you own vs how much you contact to do labor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Owning stock in Disney would give me a share in the profits. I could also possibly vote when Disney lets shareholders do so. As a worker for Disney, I could receive money for selling my time and a portion of the profits via shares. I would thereby be a worker/owner. I would reduce that to worker, but lets entertain worker/owner as a class.

However as a worker/owner, I would not be able to make decisions that change cost. I would not own anything other than the share which is placing faith in the company. I would still try to do as little work as possible for as much compensation as possible since I am still primarily a worker.

Maybe my passive income stream will someday overcome the cost associated with meeting my material needs. I could then graduate from worker/owner to owner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Lemmy.world trying to think of hot takes

Fuck your capitalism and its destructive “creation” of wealth

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

You do realize Democratic Socialism would eliminate capitalism? Or do you mean market socialism? Or Social Democracy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Social democracies actually do have capitalism. Sweden for instance has many corporations that exist and are highly successful, while the rest of the economic system has some socialist attributes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Is that what you’re advocating for?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yep. Social democracy for the win.

Capitalism should be allowed to exist within the narrow confines of a sandbox. Its products should be equally distributed and it should be heavily regulated to prevent the creation of the Uber wealthy and extreme income inequity.

That’s just my opinion for whatever the fuck that’s worth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Capitalism is defined in terms of how it distributes wealth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No. Capitalism is merely a system of trade and and industry being controlled by private ownership. We’ve had much better wealth distribution in the past under capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
  1. The people decide. Through there elective representatives.

  2. This whole post is about an awareness that the “person” generating the wealth is actually hundreds of thousands of people generating the wealth.

Bill Gates didn’t generate 80 billion dollars. He just positioned himself in manner to that allowed him to hoard 80 billion dollars in wealth generated by countless software engineers and other workers.

  1. I don’t understand being squeamish about ANYONE trying to redistribute wealth. Right now there’s like 3 people who have as much wealth as the bottom HALF of Americans (~150,000,000 people). The situation is beyond ridiculous.
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re perfectly fitting the stereotype of the ‘temporarily embarrassed billionaire’.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 481K

    Comments