256

Flatpak integration is still not great(lemmy.world)

posted
*
by
Avatar
dorumon@lemmy.world
in
Avatar
linuxmemes@lemmy.world
136 comments
hidereport

Its even worse when you force Firefox to use wayland its icon doesn’t even show.

Edit: Oh since everyone now is confused; I only have the flatpak version of Firefox installed yet it doesn’t use the pinned icon and doesn’t even use the firefox icon under wayland at all.

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
arthurpizza@lemmy.world
-11 points

Flatpak works great. I’m sorry you don’t know how to use a computer.

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
kittykabal@kbin.social
7 points

“hey guys, I’m having a problem with my Linux install that doesn’t seem very common–”

“YOU’RE STUPID AND I HATE YOU”

this is EXACTLY why Linux gurus have a bad rep. remember the human, for goodness’ sake. don’t act like you’ve never run into a strange problem in your entire computing life that required digging deep into some 2003 forum post to solve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Hovenko@iusearchlinux.fyi
-1 points

Please show me the QA process applied to flatpaks, so I know that besides it “working” is not full of obsolete vulnerable holes. Or should I just trust the Dev is not a lazy person?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
IverCoder@lemm.ee
2 points
*

Same. I would want a Linux system with nothing but Flatpaks. Native packages with tons of unwanted changes and delayed updates can go fuck themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 69K

    Comments

Community moderators