You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

But all of this assumes no cost to continuing using oil. Because we don’t count the damages done to climate or our well-being in terms of money.

If you include the externalities of fossil fuels, it’s very very worth it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes of course I’m in favour of slavery… What do you think???

We already pay for most things with taxes. Like roads or the military. Somehow all that works out just fine.

Meanwhile your solution is for everyone to go to depression era thinking… as if that is more realistic. And won’t need regulation too.

But yes, global cooperation is indeed needed to solve climate change. There is no other way around it. And I never claimed otherwise?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s honestly quite scary that the idea of no money = slavery to these people.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators