When new money is created the central banks get it first thus it’s value is still mainly unchanged. They loan it to the government and they spend it to fund tremendous crimes.
By the time the money gets to the average person the inflation is realized by the economy and the purchasing powers has decreased.
“So of course a country invaded by the US wouldn’t have a central bank controlled by the US.”
Exactly, because the US is controlled by banks, so the US military does the bidding of the bankers. They invade because they do not control the region yet, not to “spread freedom”.
Communism is not “against the banks”, central banking is literally in the communist manifesto, communism is against banks they do not control.
The US has a central bank because it was infiltrated by communists.
When new money is created the central banks get it first thus it’s value is still mainly unchanged. They loan it to the government and they spend it to fund tremendous crimes.
By the time the money gets to the average person the inflation is realized by the economy and the purchasing powers has decreased.
That now how it work, like at all. The central bank do not control the value of the money they print, the exchanges does. If they print too much, the money will devaluate, which means inflation. Which means the US government will have to pay more for what they wanted to buy, aka printing more money, which further devaluate the money, and so on. Same goes with any currency, be it physical or crypto.
Exactly, because the US is controlled by banks, so the US military does the bidding of the bankers. They invade because they do not control the region yet, not to “spread freedom”.
Still waiting for the US to “spread their freedom” to countries that said them to go f*ck themselves, like France during the Irak invasion. And by that not by renaming French fries to Freedom fries like the some GOP politician pushed forward.
Exactly, because the US is controlled by banks, so the US military does the bidding of the bankers. They invade because they do not control the region yet, not to “spread freedom”.
They don’t need “communist bankers” for that. A fascist state would have done the same. The US need energy, which means oil. That as simple as that.
The US has a central bank because it was infiltrated by communists
So infiltrated by communism they enacled some of the worst anti-communism laws in the world? All that while being controlled by a communist central bank created (1913) before the Russian communist revolution (1917)? Yeah… right…
Globally, there is no fascist bankers, nor communist ones. It is far simpler that that.
The true villain is simply our collective greed, who want to live as comfortably as possible no matter the impact on who we see as the “others”. The politics know that, manipulate that to their own ends, creating scapegoat left and right (fascist on the left, commies on the right), to make us fight against each other.
And you are currently playing right into their hand by blaming some communist others for our collective shortcommings at finding a collective solution at a collective problem.
By printing more money they devalue the money in existence. They have first access to new money so they benefit from it and buy up assets, while the poor ignorant fool does not know how to protect himself from inflation tax.
France is controlled by the same bankers as the US, freedom-fries was a show put on for the dumb masses to consume some drama.
Where is this anti-communist act today, it has been shredded because communists run the whole place now. Even at the time the FBI stood up for the communists because they were already infiltrated.
“There was much controversy surrounding the Act. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and its Director, J. Edgar Hoover, opposed the bill on the count that it would have forced the Communist movement underground”
There is no collective greed, greed is individual. It is true that the communists use political parasites to play on some people’s greed to get something for nothing pushing for more communism.
Sure, “the bad guys do it but there is no way I, an intelligent person, may be fooled buy the same artifice”, am I right?
We can debate all day, but I’m still waiting for any evidence of what you pretend. Or should I? Is it a gut feeling? Maybe a hearsay from whatever political circle you are from? I’m curious.
