This is a bit political but i feel this should be looked at. Whatever it’s on on the Lemmy instance or the Mastodon instances.

My main concern is about the concept of Embrase Extend Extinguish they could use.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
8 points

I’m of the opinion that we should defederate right away from Meta’s service. I don’t see any advantage to giving them a chance as their whole modus operandi is collecting and harvesting user data. The whole NDA stuff really rubbed me the wrong way.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

For those who don’t know, Meta reached out to big instance admins and invited them to some kind of meeting:

https://mstdn.social/@stux/110567524159195690

Stux didn’t go but was invited, and confirmed this. Those who went were made to sign an NDA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah, I say block based on this experience alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, I don’t like devs using the term “fediverse stakeholders”. Big big red flag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The fact all these big admins went to a facebook gathering, were made to sign an NDA, and now refer to themselves as “stakeholders” is more than sus. This is a clear EEE attempt. Reinforcing my vote of pre-emptive block. Keep this data-stealing corporate nonsense out of our spaces.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Pawb.Social Feedback

!pawbsocial_feedback@pawb.social

Create post

An official community for users of Pawb.Social services (furry.engineer, pawb.fun, and pawb.social) to provide feedback and suggestions.

Community stats

  • 33

    Monthly active users

  • 59

    Posts

  • 287

    Comments

Community moderators