You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

A truly democractic society should welcome any political ideology, regardless of the incumbants current ideology.

Any political ideology opens a can of worms.

The “liberal democratic” country of Obristan has two ethnic groups: the Korai (70% of population) and the Mirai (30% of population). The Korai get together and form the Satsujin Party, whose ideology is simple: to kill all Mirai.

Is the society still a democratic society if the Satsujin Party gains a majority and passes laws ordering execution of all the Mirai? Is that society in the interests of all its people? Surely, we can understand that any reasonable society cannot allow the Satsujin Party’s ideology.

some buck that trend and just say 100% voted on Y.

I’d encourage you to read on democratic centralism. The idea is that instead of engaging in dramatic political stunts, we could have a genuine effort on all sides to listen to the differing perspectives, try to come up with the best solution, and then agree together on that best solution. That sure sounds like what democracy is supposed to be in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Shit Reactionaries Say

!shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

Under new rules (Jan 2023), only this “Shit X Say” community is allowed along with Shit Ultras Say.

This community is for anything a reactionary would say that is shit. You know the drill. This includes:

  • Liberals
  • Fascists
  • Conservatives
  • Monarchists
  • Vaushites

etc etc.

Please do include the type of reactionary between brackets [] in your post title if you can.

All posts are marked NSFW (community is NSFW) because most people don’t want to see this on their lemmygrad timeline.

Community stats

  • 690

    Monthly active users

  • 2.5K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments