You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
53 points

CSAM is never an excuse to violate everyone’s privacy.

I hate seeing people implying that it is. It’s no better then Patriot Act B.s that took away privacy in the name of catching terrorists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

This once more reminds me of the guy in Sweden who got assaulted by police, in his bed, because an American institution searched through his Yahoo mail and found pictures and videos of him and his 30 year old boyfriend and incorrectly flagged it as CSAM, and then forwarded it to Swedish authorities.

There was no justice after that. No repercussions for either the Swedish police or the American government, and no damages paid to the guy.

Could this sort of surveillance stop abuse of minors? Yeah absolutely, but at what cost?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

You’re equating a companies refusal to host links to piracy (or CSAM) and… literal assault?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, absolutely. That’s literally what I said. In fact CSAM should come bundled on every single electronic device. Then it won’t be a problem anymore.

Of course not. My comment was in response to the discussion about companies going through private emails and the like (which I recognise the original post isn’t about, but that’s what this conversation turned into) and how I take issue with that. You might argue that we have no right to privacy when we use products like gmail and whatnot, which would be a fair argument if they didn’t already dominate the market.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

When those links are hosted on Google servers, publicly available to anyone handed the link to them?… how is that a private space?

This isn’t reaching into your phone and checking the information you store on it, this is checking links you added and shared with others using their service. They absolutely have the right to check them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It is a private space when they are not shared publicly

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Except that’s not how it works.

If I go into a public park, put up a tent, then start breaking the parks rules, I’m not “in the clear” just because I’m in a tent and didn’t invite anyone else in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

The fact that you think “privacy” existed even then is telling. The only thing that changed in that regard with the so-called Patriot BS is whether the gov’t could do it without the guile that otherwise had been SoP for decades. 🤦🏼‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I call them human parrots, they like to repeat words or phrases that they do not understand or lack full understanding to get the approval of their caretakers and receive treats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

😂😂😂

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asshole Design

!assholedesign@lemmy.ml

Create post

Nothing comes before profit – especially not the consumer.

Community stats

  • 4

    Monthly active users

  • 17

    Posts

  • 276

    Comments

Community moderators