You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
3 points
permalink
report
reply
64 points

The same hong kong owned by western capitalist for 70 years right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If it’s a problem caused by Western capitalism, why hasn’t China fixed it in the over 25 years?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

How are you a star trek fan and this stupid, do you just clap at the spaceships?

permalink
report
parent
reply

They doubled the average size of new apartments by outlawing the appalling tiny units that the British establishment encouraged and by engaging in actual planning concerning land use, another thing the British colonial era ignored.

Now it’s about 50-90 sqm for new apartments which is the same as other high density cities like Barcelona. New York for example is 50-70 sqm.

They estimate a further gain of 10-20% in floor area per person by 2030.

Thanks China!

Your dumb ass should start questioning your assumptions because they’re wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

You’re absolutely right. The One Country Two Systems approach isn’t worth the paper it’s written on now that the Brits are flagrantly interfering with HK’s affairs.

The PRC should immediately integrate HK into Guangdong Province, arrest the real estate oligarchs and seize their assets.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The communism button got misplaced and ended up in a dubiously legal tech market smh my head

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Because you don’t just throw people out of their homes without a viable alternative. Viable alternatives take time and resources to build, neither of which are infinite. As @Kaisen@hexbear.net has already explained, this is already being done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

why hasn’t China fixed it in the over 25 years?

Because when China under Deng took it back from Britain by basically telling them “fuck off or we’ll do it by force” and Thatcher agreed (knowing full well they could not fight to keep it and would have had very little support for that anyway other than the western shitholes which were more concerned about the USSR and other communist countries in europe than China at the time), one of the requirements of the deal that Britain made was to keep the current system with unchanged policies for 50 years. This was signed in the Joint Declaration.

This blueprint would be elaborated on in the Hong Kong Basic Law (the post-handover regional constitution) and the central government’s policies for the territory were to remain unchanged for a period of at least 50 years after 1997.

So if you want to complaint to the correct people responsible the way it is currently, complain to the British.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

autonomous capitalist Hong Kong

is this mainland Communist China?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What part of One Country; Two Systems do you not understand? This is caused by Hong Kong being allowed to be 100% exploitative capitalism for the purposes of trade (and the agreement made with Britain) rather than socialism.

permalink
report
parent
reply

traingang

!urbanism@hexbear.net

Create post

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post “lmao” or use the tired “_____ challenge” format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

“that train pic is too powerful lmao” - u/Cadende

Community stats

  • 706

    Monthly active users

  • 700

    Posts

  • 5.3K

    Comments