i know only a little bit about each philosophy. they seem so similar, and i wonder, are they really just the same thing in spirit? or would you make certain distinctions? i’m seeking more understanding. i know that each has a different history, but i am asking about the philosophies themselves, separate from their manifestations.

additionally, are there other titled philosophies that are more or less the same as these?

i have read some definitions of so-called “classical liberalism” and they vary. some say that it is a philosophy that isn’t attached to any political agendas, but other definitions bind it to certain political agendas. i presume that so-called anarchism and libertarianism are also defined in different ways depending on who you ask.

it seems to me that many of the terms people use to categorize each other are too ambiguous, over-simplify, become perverted over time, and cause too much misunderstanding. maybe we should rid ourselves of these category conventions altogether, but that’s a conversation for another time; my primary question is enough of a topic for this post’s discussion.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points

Without private property how do you solve that we both want to use the same resource at the same time for different purposes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I know this is gonna seem wild, but… you talk to each other?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bro people have been doing that for hundreds of thousands of years. Read Elinor Ostrom and her book Governing the Commons. As Ostrom says “if it works in practice, it works in theory.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Anarchism

!anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don’t take yourselves too seriously.

Community stats

  • 1.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 194

    Posts

  • 2K

    Comments

Community moderators