You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-32 points

More pro nuke propagate while Japan dumps waste into the ocean. Perfect timing actually. to all the haters and downvaters I give you a link showing how solar and wind are cheaper and better. Of course you will ignore it. Who needs evidence when you’re already sold amirite

KPFA - The Ralph Nader Radio Hour: The False Promise of Small Nuclear Reactors – The Ralph Nader Radio Hour – August 21, 2023

Episode webpage: https://kpfa.org/program/the-ralph-nader-radio-hour/

Media file: https://archives.kpfa.org/data/20230821-Mon1100.mp3

permalink
report
reply
24 points

The fact that you’re bringing up Japan (which is massively overblown - you’re at more radiation risk from a coal power plant) shows you’re not serious about this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m curious about the radiation risk from a coal power plant, are radioactive carbon isotopes generated in the coal firing process?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Here’s an article - coal naturally contains trace amounts of radioactive elements and burning a bunch of it concentrates them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Carbon contains radioactive isotopes and if you use a lot of it to generate electricity you end up with a lot of it in a single spot. It’s specifically carbon-14 you measure when using radiocarbon dating to estimate how old an item is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

… approximately 2,000 coal samples from the Western United States … concentrations of uranium fall in the range from slightly below 1 to 4 parts per million (ppm). … Coals with more than 20 ppm uranium are rare in the United States. Thorium concentrations in coal fall within a similar 1–4 ppm range, … Coals with more than 20 ppm thorium are extremely rare.

https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1997/fs163-97/FS-163-97.html

concentrations of coals in China are estimated based on uranium analyses of 1535 coal samples … Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous (J3–K1), and Eogene and Neogene (E–N) coals are 2.91, 5.43, 3.67, 1.18, 1.84, and 3.92 μg/g, respectively. The overall average weighted uranium concentration of coals in China is 2.31 μg/g.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544206001113

AFAIK that’s 1.18-5.43 ppm.

Obviously, when you burn that, it gets concentrated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to ignorance. They probably really do care but have little formal education and also the algorithms have decided to send them to a particular bubble of the internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Dude, the Japanese nuclear waste water is barely radioactive. You receive a higher dose of radiation eating a fucking banana.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, bananas are crazy radioactive…

I had to get measured before and after training to work in nuclear in the military, and they ordered us not to eat bananas for a week before either test.

Not that bananas are bad for you, it’s just exposure is tracked well below limits there’ll actually be negative side effects. So eating a couple bananas recently is enough to throw up red flags on the test

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Bananas aren’t even that radioactive. 0.1 microsieverts.

If you really want to expose yourself to large amounts of radiation, start smoking. 160,000 microsieverts a year, contains radioactive polonium and lead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

because you wanna be combative, I’ll be the same.

what are we supposed to do when it’s not sunny, or if we live in parts of the world that don’t see much/any sun, and it’s not windy. batteries? you already know we aren’t at a point that is viable yet, we’ll get there, not today. what are we supposed to do when the entire plant scales up the demand for solar panels to replace the lack of nuclear, and suddenly there isn’t enough scale to fulfil that demand and prices skyrocket.

I want a future of energy stability that is able to handle a changing climate, and changing political climates. I want a world where people have endless, cheap, free, low carbon cost energy without it being the plaything of whoever is a political leader this week. a combination of nuclear, solar, wind and anything else we can throw in there does that.

going all in on just two that have similar problems, does not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yh solar and wind is better, until it’s night time and the wind is still.

Until mass power storage is a solved problem we need base load power the demand of which can currently only be met by fossil fuels or nuclear.

Honestly, saying “yh, but wind and solar!?!?” whilst clearly having very little concept of the power demands of a nation makes you seem extremely silly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You can use hydro dams, pump storage, bio fuel, geothermal

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

A catastrophic earthquake caused a massive tsunami which hit a 40-year-old reactor and caused the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl.

One person died as a result of the nuclear portion of the disaster.

One.

The perfect storm of shit hitting the fan killed one person. Modern reactor design and safety is so much better than Fukushima Daiichi, and outside Japan, there’s no reason to build a reactor within 100 miles of a tsunami danger zone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

…while Japan dumps waste into the ocean.

China releases vastly more tritium into the ocean than Japan ever will, and has for years.

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20230824_36/

KPFA - The Ralph Nader Radio Hour

Nader is a Russian shill who whines about "How much suffering will he (Biden) tolerate being inflicted on the long-suffering Russian people? "

Further we’ve known for years that Russia will fund any Western Environmental Group that it can leverage to produce more dependency on Russian Oil and Gas. If Nader isn’t one of those he may as well be since he’s serving their objective.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments