The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
64 points
*

The problem is that copyright last way to fucking long and they keep extending it. It should be the same as patents… 15 years I think. I’m just going to keep xdcc get whatever I want until they fix it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

I agree, but the internet archive doesn’t have the authority to roll the duration back right? So it was illegal. We all agree the law needs to change, but it is still the law currently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Sometimes laws need to b broken to bring changes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-62 points

Well the average career is 30 years. So you think that if I was to start a photography business that at the end of my 30 year run, half of my career should be publicly available? That means that people could use half of my life’s work without owing me any compensation? Copyright protects a lot of small creators, not just Disney and the likes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Good thing you’re covered for 70 years after you’re dead then

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I think you should get paid for working, not for doing nothing due to work you did in the past. You know, like everyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Exactly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

So if you release a movie that took you 5 years to make, you only get paid on the day it is released. Not the next day, because you should not get paid for doing nothing due to work you did in the past. Keep working. Gotcha.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

but if your work is good enough and better than your competitors it shouldn’t be a problem. that’s how the free market works right?

the problem here is capitalists want it both ways. they want to be able litigate any competition into oblivion… but hey, it s just business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Way to sweepingly generalize something. I had to use copyright laws when I was a pro track photographer. I found out that one of the drivers owned a printing shop. He was telling people to purchase one photo from me at my price and then turning around, scanning it in, and re-printing them for the customers at a lower price. Same exact work, so you can’t argue about the quality. This fuck was also taking my images and using them in advertising which was also a copyright violation. This isn’t about who took the better picture as I was the person behind the camera. It’s about protecting work, that in my case involved time and actual sweat each and every weekend I was out in the sun. But it seems the majority of people in this thread think that he was justified in stealing MY work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Thats how it works for patents, medicines, etc…

When someone build a home… There is not even any time at all… You get paid once and then you can forget your past work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What percentage of your money would come from 15 year old content you produced? Please reply with the median.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 6.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 125K

    Comments