"Soon after we published this story, one of the r/MildlyInteresting moderators told The Verge that the entire mod team has now been reinstated — and by a different admin than the one that removed them. The mod’s account had received a 7-day suspension, but that has been reversed, too, they said. A Verge commenter who identifies as an r/MildlyInteresting mod also says the team has been reinstated and unsuspended.
Asked if Reddit could confirm the reinstatement, [Reddit spokesperson Tim] Rathschmidt declined, saying, “I’m not going to set a precedent of confirming with The Verge every action we do or don’t take to ensure users can access their communities.”
He didn’t elaborate on how removing a subreddit’s entire moderation team with no communication ensures users can access their communities, particularly since they were never entirely inaccessible beyond the limitations imposed by Reddit itself."
GOOD.
Maybe there’s at least one person fighting for good in there.
Or, the random person saying the mods got reinstated is a plant and just wants people to have faith and come back.
Or, the random person saying the mods got reinstated is a plant and just wants people to have faith and come back.
This is a fact that’s easy to verify independently. Why sow conspiracy? The admins are guilty of a lot, but this isn’t one of them. Yet. Let’s stick to true information so we can’t be painted as rabid anti-reddit conspiracists?
Why sow conspiracy?
Is my suggestion departed enough from expectation from exhibited behavior patterns from Reddit’s CEO and admins that it needs to be cautioned as intentionality sowing conspiracy?
Is it really outside the bounds of what’s possible?
If you criticize it so, and think it easy to verify, then why not provide that verification?
Why pretend this is an extreme idea when we see sock puppeting often enough to have a term for it?
If you criticize it so, and think it easy to verify, then why not provide that verification?
You can go look at the mod list of /r/mildlyinteresting just as easily as I can. The fact that you haven’t shows you’re more interested in Tucker-Carlson-esque inflammatory hypotheticals than actual verification. I’m not going to go fetch a screenshot like a good dog just so you can ignore that, too.
Edit: For some reason I can’t reply below - did I get blocked? Hmm. Anyway, I’m generally a helpful person, but I’ll be as hostile as I need to be to protect this place from becoming known for mad disinformation. We’re on the same side here: Spez is absolutely a shithead having a week-long toddler meltdown at this point, but there are so many factual things to call him out on that resorting to lies is both unnecessary and damaging.
See also: making a show out of that time he was a mod of jailbait when he was likely added without his consent.