131

Some of Starfield’s planets are meant to be empty by design - but that’s not boring, Bethesda insists(www.rockpapershotgun.com)

posted
by
Avatar
Andy Costanza@programming.dev
in
Avatar
starfield@lemmy.zip
131 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
Zeusbottom@sh.itjust.works
2 points

When they said this would be hard sci-fi, I actually imagined myself piloting an actual space ship and doing astronaut things

So, KSP 1&2 then? :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
riceandbeans161@discuss.tchncs.de
1 point

or Elite Dangerous

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Zeusbottom@sh.itjust.works
1 point

No orbital mechanics in E:D, no in-space EVA. It does have a slightly more realistic flight model with dampening off, but it’s not true to life.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Starfield

!starfield@lemmy.zip

Create post

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

  • Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

  • No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
  • Add [Spoilers] to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post.
  • Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don’t need a spoiler tag.
  • Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

::: spoiler 
<spoiler here>
:::

Community stats

  • 288

    Monthly active users

  • 395

    Posts

  • 4.4K

    Comments

Community moderators