You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

I asked sapient_cogbag who would do the automation work he likes to be implemented? Because someone has to get up in the morning and actually do that work, it doesn’t grow on it’s own.

And you’re asking me about threats of starvation and homelessness … I don’t get it …

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Then you missed the whole point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The current way we coerce (by threatening starvation and homelessness) is not the only way to make people do things. I agree that free everything forever with sprinkles is probably not going to work or allow us to maintain our current quality of life (I too like pop-tarts medicine, and computers). It’s not a binary. There are options in between that can be used to motivate people to do even unpleasant things.

I think we coerce way to much and I think a lot of coercion that we do benefits only a few people and not the many.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Who coerced you by threats?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No one in particular. But I am coerced into working as are you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

*they

permalink
report
parent
reply

Antiwork

!antiwork@lemmy.ml

Create post
  1. We’re trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We’re trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

Community stats

  • 269

    Monthly active users

  • 424

    Posts

  • 4.7K

    Comments