This is a bit political but i feel this should be looked at. Whatever it’s on on the Lemmy instance or the Mastodon instances.

My main concern is about the concept of Embrase Extend Extinguish they could use.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point

@brodokk I know I’m often in the minority, but with the way the fediverse is designed, I don’t see why we should inherently defederate on sight or anything. If we want more people to use the Fediverse and give our friends more of a reason to be here, it’s about allowing MORE services, not less.

Yes, I do think there is a potential for E.E.E… but at this point there’s no real active concern for that actually happening, just speculation.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

@brodokk as far as data privacy goes, foss-social put it best when they mentioned, they’d just get access to the same set of data that any public activitypub application could. It’s more or less only “public” data they can access.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Pawb.Social Feedback

!pawbsocial_feedback@pawb.social

Create post

An official community for users of Pawb.Social services (furry.engineer, pawb.fun, and pawb.social) to provide feedback and suggestions.

Community stats

  • 33

    Monthly active users

  • 59

    Posts

  • 287

    Comments

Community moderators