NASA finally admits what everyone already knows: SLS is unaffordable::“At current cost levels the SLS program is unsustainable.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
17 points

Maybe if we gave a little less to SpaceX, NASA could afford to do more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Can I ask: do you actually believe NASA builds their own rockets themselves? Like out back in their shed with a table saw and pliers?

The prime contractor on the sls is boeing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Boeing used to be a good engineering firm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes, up until mid 90s

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

As certified by Boeing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

It’s just hate for musk, people who hate musk have blinders on and think every company he has any input into is a scam.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Not a scam, but a tool to help enemies of the democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Nah, I hate musk as much as the rest of them. SpaceX is the only company he has that’s worth a damn. I was really kind of happy when he started screwing with Twitter because he has less time to screw up SpaceX.

Now, that said, SpaceX needs competition. I will take us for musk to have one bad trip hop in there and start screwing that company over. If NASA is fully dependent on them…

SpaceX isn’t doing anything another company can’t do. It’s just that Boeing owns our f****** government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

To be fair, based on his companies the odds of that bet are quite good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

If NASA cancelled every single contact they had with SpaceX… they might be able to afford 1/3rd of an SLS launch. Or maybe not, because then they’d have to start paying Russians for rides up to the ISS.

SpaceX is saving NASA boatloads of money. Which Congress is forcing them to waste on SLS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

SpaceX is getting 2-3 bn dollars for Starship HLS development, most of the funding is coming from SpaceX itself. SLS costs up to 4 bn per flight. I’m not even going to mention the insane cost-overruns and years of delays associated with NASA’s cost-plus contract with Boeing to build the damn thing.

SLS is a sunk cost fallacy and jobs program.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Even then, commercial launch providers get much further with less money. Sure, if NASA had more budget, they could afford the SLS program. But the commercial launch providers show that they could be more efficient with the money they do have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That would destroy US space capabilities. Just because Elon is a racist dipshit doesn’t mean we should stop building the best rockets in the world.

Honestly if we have less money to Boeing and more to spacex, NASA would be way better off.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 538K

    Comments