You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
13 points

So we decrease it from 13% of global to 10%? Not much of a dent in view of the 87% from fossil fuel use 🤷🏽‍♂️ but let’s not mention that

“Globally, the largest share of humanity’s CO2 emissions stems from burning fossil fuels, which made up about 87% of CO2 emissions over the past 20 years. Land-use emissions are responsible for the remaining 13%.” https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-how-land-use-drives-co2-emissions-around-the-world/

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Seriously. If everyone on earth stopped eating meat tomorrow, we would still be just as fucked as we are now.

And do we expect the meat industry to just disappear? They have lots of land and equipment that they will try to use in other ways. Maybe they’ll even decide to drill for oil on their land.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Even if we could cut all fossil fuels, the animal industry would push us over the Paris goal. Changing what we eat is a option we all have but let’s not mention that

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357

permalink
report
parent
reply

Green - An environmentalist community

!green@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

Community stats

  • 191

    Monthly active users

  • 604

    Posts

  • 2.7K

    Comments