Image is from this article in the New York Times.
A magnitude 6.8 earthquake struck Morocco on September 8th, with the epicenter 73 kilometers away from Marrakesh.
At least 2500 people have died as of September 11th, most outside Marrakesh, with more people being pulled out of the rubble every day, making it the deadliest earthquake in Morocco since 1960, and the second-deadliest earthquake this year (first being, of course, the one in Turkiye-Syria in February, which killed nearly 60,000 people). While the deaths are the most horrific part, damage to historic sites has also been very significant - including buildings dating back to the 1000s.
Morocco is situated close to the Eurasian-African plate boundary, where the two plates are colliding. The rock comprising the Atlas Mountains, situated along the northwestern coast of Africa separating the Sahara from the Mediterranean Sea, are being pushed together at a rate of 1 millimeter per year, and thus the mountains are slowly growing. As they collide, energy is stored up over time and then released, and faults develop. The earthquake this month originated on one such fault, as did the earthquake in 1960. The earthquake hypocenter was 20-25 kilometers underground, with 1.7 meters (or 5 and a half feet) of rock suddenly shifting along a fault ~30 kilometers (19 miles) long.
Earthquake prediction is still deeply imprecise at best, and obtaining decent knowledge and forewarning of earthquakes is highly dependent on dense seismometer arrays that constantly monitor seismic activity, such as in Japan, and detailed understanding of the local and regional tectonic environment. The best way to prevent damage is to build earthquake-resistant infrastructure and establish routines for escaping buildings and reaching safety. All of these, of course, are underdeveloped to nonexistent in developing countries, particularly in poorer communities inside those countries.
The Country of the Week, in honour of Allende’s death 50 years ago (the only bad geopolitical event that has occurred on September 11th, of course), is Chile. Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.
The weekly update is here!
Links and Stuff
The bulletins site is down.
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Add to the above list if you can.
Resources For Understanding The War
Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Telegram Channels
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
Pro-Russian
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Last week’s discussion post.
I read it and I don’t have anything smart or rational to say, other than how tired I am of this one particular assumption palpable in the way many Western lefties think (including this piece, I feel): “y’all in the third world need to catch up with us — that is, become Western/modern AND THEN, ONLY THEN can we start building solidarity to takedown capitalism.” It seems really difficult for many on the Western left (whatever that definition is) to imagine solidarity NOT on the terms of their Eurocentric history and experiences. /rant.
I agree with this, and there’s two more brainworms that I see often in those people. The first is not understanding just how dominant the United States is in the world and how it so readily destroys any attempts to do “perfect revolutions” with no authoritarianism, no mistakes, etc, and how the US in large part formed the non-Western players that they are now critiquing; and the second brainworm, related to the first, is assuming that the crimes of the countries opposing the West are somehow equal, or at least approaching, the crimes of the West - that one can say “Well, the Iraq War on one hand, the Ukraine War on the other - both sides are equally bad here”, and so on. We are talking orders of magnitude difference here, when you tally everything up. Russia has killed hundreds of thousands; the United States has killed tens of millions.
I was once in the same org as (at least) one of the authors of this piece, and yeah, that was how we put it. “U.S. imperialism is bad, but so is Russian imperialism!” It led to some very convenient alignments with American foreign policy orthodoxy. I had an epiphany at the beginning of the pandemic, watching how well China handled it, and I’m embarrassed at how we fell for lines like that.
It’s really important to actually read through Lenin’s Imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism. There are a lot of people who have said they’ve read it, but then they make incredibly elementary theory mistakes like this.
Imperialism is primarily defined by the separation of economic zones of control, where different economic laws and mores are applied. Essentially what defines the core, as opposed to the periphery. It’s not just taking land, it’s taking land and then immediately applying a different standard of laws, rules and regulations towards it than you do your own ‘citizenry’. Now, we can then discuss how aspects of fascism is ‘imperialism’ applied towards the core, but again, it is about differences in legal, social and economic rights, duties and expectations of subjects, a definition that literally stretches back to the Persians but I am digressing from the point. The point is that, so far, Russia, despite being a right-wing populist kleptocratic oligarchy, has not done ‘imperialism’, with the biggest reason being that they don’t really have a large enough economy or international prestige to commit to maintaining an actual imperialist project. They can take and hold land that is directly adjacent to them but they can’t take, hold and subjugate the citizens of that land to a whole new economic regime, they can only incorporate it into their core, which is not, by Lenin and historical definition, imperialism.
Does that mean that what Russia is doing is good and nessecery? No. But it doesn’t compare at all to what the U.S. does on a global scale with it’s sanctions regimes and wars. If anything, what the U.S. and NATO are doing to Ukraine is imperialism because they are incorporating an economic regime that would not be used in even the most batshit libertarian states in the U.S. into the country.
