You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
9 points

That page has to be satire… right?

The whole “police your language, so there’s no chance anyone could ever be offended” idea is such an oppressive path to a more equal society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I mean I hope so? One of the top offensive terms was wheelchair bound…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Isn’t that just a fact? Like, I get why words such as removed should be avoided due to it being an insult et all, but wheelchair bound? English is a funny language so I might be missing something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They want to be called "wheeled individual " as being wheelchair bound denotes that they’re restricted /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It is a foolish path, but to call it “oppressive” is to tip your hand that you have no real notion of what oppression is if you’re worried about what amounts to a slightly different set of etiquette on a semi-anonymous internet forum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

This isn’t just a problem on the internet. I run into people in real life who think this way, often.

How many times have comedians or other entertainers come under fire for jokes or other bits they’ve done? It’s a lot. Comedians will all tell you that they can’t perform in places like New York the same way anymore, because half the things they say get booed from the crowd.

“Why should I care about Dave Chappelle, or anyone else, getting slammed for some offensive thing they said?”

Because entertainer’s acts are one of the ways that people come to understand the world around them. Their satire is an important tool for democracy to unravel the bullshit that surrounds them. It’s supposed to be the opposite of sterile.

And if “dirty language” means that you’re okay silencing those guys, along with everyone else, you are engaging in oppression on a far wider scale than you realize.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That’s a path to inequality, not equality. Trying to silence people because you don’t like certain words is a bit of fascism in itself, which these people claim to be against.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Telling people not to use a word, whatever might be said about it being a good idea or not, is not fascism. “Fascism” is a specific social phenomenon that has emerged from the decay of capitalism as reactionary popular movements that seek to offload their poverty onto social minorities. “Taboo words” have existed for about as long as language has existed for an endless variety of reasons. Whether having some words be taboo is good or bad, calling it fascism is completely ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 35K

    Comments