I can’t believe people like these keep trying to fix something that’s not broken (bike tires) with this space-age nonsense talk. Preying on the gullible is what they’re doing.

$500 USD for two of these tires.

What do you all think?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

I go in with an open mind, but there were a few red flags for me:

  • they keep confusing “tires” and “wheels” on that KS page. You know the difference, right? Why don’t they?
  • they repeat that NASA design bit over and over, and even provide a link to a NASA web site but the tire shown there is very different from the design in the KS. I fear that the economics of the NASA design would never work out in the marketplace, but that’s not stopping them from pushing this sale.
  • as someone else pointed out, they claim the re-treading process would be cheap and easy, without saying how it’s done or even who will do that.

Also, there have been quite a few previous inventions which claim to improve upon mostly rubber, air-filled tires. None of them made enough economic sense to replace what we’ve had going for many, many years. I’ll be happy to learn I am wrong and this company can really do that, but starting at $500 for two tires seems like a bad start to me. We will see…

permalink
report
parent
reply

Bicycling

!bicycling@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

Community stats

  • 485

    Monthly active users

  • 151

    Posts

  • 991

    Comments

Community moderators