You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

How so? Isn’t it rather light on resources?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Wayland requires a Desktop Environment from what I can see. There is Sway, but that is a tiling environment, but I know little about that. So for “floating windows”, all there is GNOME3, KDE and Enlightenment. DE are heavy to begin with, cwm on X is very lite on resources.

This I am not sure about, but from what I have read, all window processing (rendering) needs to be done by the “Widow manager”. In X you just call functions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You don’t need a DE, and Sway is pretty light and snappy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, that is what people keep saying, but isn’t sway a Tiling Window Manager ? I do not like Tiling, if something that works exactly like cwm, then I would not be too concerned about Wayland.

So far, the only choices for Wayland seems to be GMOME3, KDE, soon XFCE, the rest are tiling like sway. I just heard about Hyprland, which is also tiling.

So seems for me and I am sure others, the selection is very limited.

permalink
report
parent
reply

OpenBSD

!openbsd@lemmy.sdf.org

Create post

General OpenBSD community!

Community stats

  • 5

    Monthly active users

  • 50

    Posts

  • 91

    Comments

Community moderators