You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
63 points

Kavaratzis should not be liable.

If the original cheque is ever found, and someone else attempts to cash it, that would be fraud. Now that Kavaratzis has requested a new cheque, if the old one ever makes it to their possession and they attempt to cash it, that would also be fraud. We figured this out DECADES ago, that’s why cheques have a holding period.

Whoever is cashing the cheque is responsible to make sure it clears before exchanging it for money, and the original cheque should be annulled so it cannot be cashed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Exactly. I do not understand why this is an issue at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I do not understand why this is an issue at all.

TD having to do their job is the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Right, this check is not a bearer bond, its made out to a singular person. There shouldn’t be any issue here. It’s not 1850 where it takes weeks to verify a check

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Nope, it’s 2023, where people seem to have forgotten how cheques work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Canada

!canada@lemmy.ca

Create post

What’s going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Regions

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social & Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.5K

    Posts

  • 51K

    Comments

Community moderators