‘Capitalism is dead. Now we have something much worse’: Yanis Varoufakis on extremism, Starmer, and the tyranny of big tech::In his new book, the maverick Greek economist says we are witnessing an epochal shift. At his island home, he argues it’s now the ‘fiefdoms’ of tech firms that shape us

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
26 points

This is a weird take. Just because someone is (or has been) successful he can’t speak about or for socialism?

You can’t be successful and a socialist? Is that it? That’s a very narrow and simply wrong view which has resulted in a lot of damage in societies which adopted it.

Socialism needs succes stories. Otherwise, what’s the point? Mediocrity for all? That will never fly or become popular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He was also the financial advisor of sorts at Valve, the company that takes a 30% of all their pc game sales.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

20% after the initial $50 million. The same company that has used that revenue to revolutionize Linux as a gaming platform. Same company that helped fix graphics api integrations. Same company that actually cares about their consumers and the gaming ecosystem?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pretty sure all those things happened after Yanis left, so I don’t think it’s fair to contribute those changes to him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

The problem is he doesn’t walk the walk. His success comes from capitalism. He’s very well off because of capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

So you can only critique capitalism if you’re unsuccessful? That doesn’t make any sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Sure you can. It’s just that it comes across a whole lot less hypocritical coming from someone who hasn’t first exploited that system themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Why would someone talk about the pitfalls of a system while benefiting from that system?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Which country doesn’t engage in that economic arrangement?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

By choice or by circumstance? The rich profit from capitalism therefore they use their wealth to maintain the system that is benefiting them the most. The poor have to participate in varying degrees just to survive.

You think people choose to bust their asses for $8/hr?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 518K

    Comments