cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/news@lemmy.world/t/488620

65% of U.S. adults say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-12 points

The whole point of the electoral college is to give equitable representation to every state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

But it isn’t equitable because presidential candidates only ever pay attention to swing states.

And people should be represented equally. The location of a citizen shouldn’t effect the strength of their voice.

Ever single other public office in the U.S is voted by popular vote. If there were problems with it then why don’t we have mini electoral colleges for each seat? The president should be a popular vote, no different than any other office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

If it was population based, they’d only pay attention to large populations.

Don’t get me wrong, I continue not to care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Theres only one population, the US population

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I love how conservatives do not care about any topic yet they spend their precious time writing tons of comments on topics they definitely do not care about…

It’s nice to see who the real snowflakes are from time to time :D

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Why does the state matter at all…?

Why should a vote be counted differently depending on the state it was cast in?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Tbf I guess it makes a bit of sense, if say LA, NYC, CHI, and DC all vote to ban cars because they feasibly can and they have the population density to make it happen, some guy in Nebraska who’s nearest neighbor is 15mi away might be upset that he has to get a horse and buggy to buy cold cuts at the costco. On the one hand, fuck him, he should abandon his farm, life, and friends and move to the city (to starve with the rest of us I guess, if all the farmers move), but on the other they probably don’t want to do that which is why they live where they do now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That’s not “being fair” that’s “being unaware that the presidential election is only for selecting a president”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

if say LA, NYC, CHI, and DC all vote to ban cars because they feasibly can and they have the population density to make it happen

Nobody is trying to do that. That’s just a boogeyman the media is telling you to get you riled up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Pretty sure that’s the senate.

permalink
report
parent
reply

conservative

!conservative@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

Community stats

  • 512

    Monthly active users

  • 185

    Posts

  • 2.5K

    Comments