Any Chromium and Firefox browser prior to version 116 will be vulnerable to this, update your browsers.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
12 points

whats wrong with it

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Try linking one and sending it to someone else. I tried it and the recipient died two days later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

jokes aside what is bad with it

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

There’s some politics involved. Basically, everyone is rallying behind JPEGXL instead of WebP, but Google refuses to support JPEGXL in Chrome. The reasoning they gave is weak, so it’s assumed that they’re just trying to force the format they invented on everyone because they can.

IIRC, performance of the two formats is similar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

“everyone”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

why does everyone like jpegxl and why does google care if it’s foss

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

JPEG XL, like AVIF and HEIC and WebP, is basically a next generation format that supports much higher quality at lower file sizes compared to JPEG and PNG.

Among those four formats, JPEG XL is promising because it allows for recompression of JPEG losslessly. That means if you take an image that was already encoded as JPEG (as the vast, vast majority of images are), you can recompress with no additional loss in quality from the conversion. That’s something that isn’t true of the others.

JPEG XL also has a much higher maximum quality and specific features great for high quality image workflows (like for professional photographers, publishers, and those who need to print images). WebP, AVIF, and HEIC are good for sharing on the web, but the printing and publishing workflow support requires a few more conversions along the way.

I thought this blog post by a cloud image delivery network that played a big role in developing JPEG XL was pretty persuasive, even if they had a direct interest in JPEG XL adoption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly why WebP is shit, and Google literally owning everything shouldn’t be normalized.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s a format that most major image editors don’t support. Basically, if you wanted to do anything with it, you need to first convert it to a different format. It’s the only format that has this problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s fair except it’s not the only format that has this problem. There’s JPEG 2000 and AVIF which have even less image editor support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I had meant to say common format. I’ve never encountered a JPEG 2000.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m old enough to remember when the same argument was made for PNG files. It’s a stupid argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

WEBP is 13 years old at this point and lacks the support that PNG had 3 years into its lifetime. The benefits are marginal, and without platform support it can’t catch on. Do your research before calling someone else’s argument stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I think most people dislike it because Google made it. Google is evil as fuck, but it’s a damn good image format, obviously so since it’s way smaller for the same visuals compared to the older formats, plus it supports transparency. Google is evil but still makes good software sometimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 538K

    Comments