You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Higher taxes is just a cost of doing business which is passed on to other tenants, be it long or short term rentals, even if housing stock is temporarily held - though I don’t disagree that such a vacancy tax is a good.

GP was right - forbid corporations from owning any residential property if 4 or fewer units and greater than four unless the building is wholly owned.

On the tax side, add a purchasing tax of 15-25%, 90% of which is rebated at closing for non-corporations who have not received the rebate in the previous 24 months. That targets flippers and property-bros willing to go naked on liability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We do need to have an exception for those who need to buy through a corporation in order to protect their privacy, especially with the rise of professions such as streaming.

Those professions aren’t going to be going anywhere anytime soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This would take all the single family and duplexes off the rental market and make a ton of people homeless. No thanks. There’s enough people homeless in this country due to drug and alcohol issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Personal Finance

!personalfinance@lemmy.ml

Create post

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

Community stats

  • 5

    Monthly active users

  • 198

    Posts

  • 3.2K

    Comments