11 points
Hm… risk of nuclear disaster? Or more expense? Hm… I’ll have to think about this one.
0 points
Your logic is fallacious: the solution is not to build a nuclear reactor but seek an alternative.
8 points
Yes I understand. It was a cheeky reply. But alternatives are actually limited if you consider all the benefits of nuclear: high energy output, limited land use, no dependence on weather or time of day, no massive subsidy to Chinese manufacturing, no carbon, all resources mineable in the US, waste all physically contained…
Got alternatives to that?
1 point
0 points
*
