You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
19 points

‘you get further with a nice word and a gun than you do with a nice word alone’

If a fascist marches, do you ask them to please don’t do that? Do you march against them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

You get shot with a nice word and a gun

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

That’s the entire point of the saying. You dont get shot with a nice word and a gun because you’re not unarmed. The reference to “nice word” in the second half is like saying, “you could try to wash dishes with good thoughts, but good thoughts and scrubbing with soap and water is more effective.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

No you definitely get shot when you try to be the shooter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

I hope anyone that touches a firearm drops dead on the spot. I don’t need adults with the mindset of a 8 year old in this world. I’m not debating anyone defending fire arms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The other side doesn’t have to debate.
The other side has guns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And some of them are insane enough to kill people based on skin color, gender identity / expression, and more.

permalink
report
parent
reply

@ackzsel @seahorse @Jaytreeman ah yes, marginalized people who are regularly threatened by violence, armed fascists, and the state being willing to use firearms to defend themselves and their right to exist are totally the ones with the mentality of an 8-year-old, not the person who thinks we should literally just roll over and let people beat us up and murder us and eliminate us from public life in order to preserve some perfect pacifist moral high ground because firearms are an ooo spooky evil shibboleth only “bad guys” touch and “all violence is bad.” Thinking all violence, even in self-defense, is bad regardless of the context is totally a mature and well thought through position and not an overly simplistic view of how morality works. Believing that using a specific implement of violence is bad simply because a group you don’t like likes that tool is totally adult thinking. Believing in pure pacifism in the face of genocidal evil as if that’s in any way practical or moral is totally a nuanced adult view of the world and not the most simplistic 5-year-old understanding of morality that you get from children’s cartoons.

permalink
report
parent
reply

@ackzsel @seahorse @Jaytreeman seriously, when the level of your thinking is “guns bad and anyone who uses them is evil” you don’t get to accuse other people of having a child-like view of the world lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Question for you: would you rather all the guns be in the hands of the government? Because guns won’t disappear due to your wish. In countries all over the world, conflict is very real and not having guns would mean utter defeat for those fighting against fascists.

We get it, it would be a different world if guns were never invented. But they have been. And relinquishing that power to those that would see you not exist simply isn’t an option anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Hope alone will get you nowhere but beneath an authoritarian’s boot, figuratively or literally. Please be pragmatic.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Socialist Rifle Association

!socialistra@midwest.social

Create post

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 83

    Posts

  • 340

    Comments

Community moderators