You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-24 points
*

The war itself made things less stable and, arguably, more people died as a byproduct of the war than if the war had never happened.

The fact that things recovered (ish) is a convenient coincidence and not the expectation. If you look at other times the US or NATO intervened, you’ll see why it’s not a given that things will be more stable afterwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Well we can play “what if” all we want, but bringing it back to the main point of Sanders, you can argue all you want about if it was the correct course of action but his vote was to stop an invading force.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Sure, but that’s a perfectly valid reason for anti-war protestors to dislike him. There’s a belief out there that diplomacy can resolve most conflicts and that military force should only be used after diplomacy is exhausted.

There’s a reason the UN hadn’t yet approved an intervention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s a fair argument to make

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s a reason the UN hadn’t yet approved an intervention.

Russia is on the Security Council and can veto it…

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments