Lately I see a lot of calls do have specific instances defederated for a particular subset of reasons:

  • Don’t like their content
  • Dont like their political leaning
  • Dont like their free speech approach
  • General feeling of being offended
  • I want a safe space!
  • This instance if hurting vulnerable people

I personally find each and every one of these arguments invalid. Everybody has the right to live in an echo chamber, but mandating it for everyone else is something that goes a bit too far.

Has humanity really developed into a situation where words and thoughts are more hurtful than sticks and stones?

Edit: Original context https://slrpnk.net/post/554148

Controversial topic, feel free to discuss!

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-6 points

Boycotts as individual decisions yes. Boycotts as institutional warfare (top to bottom) are not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You became part of a server which boycotts other servers when you made the individual decision to create an account here

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

As far as I’m aware (which doesn’t mean much) I haven’t seen any boycott this instance based on “I dislike opinions expressed elsewhere, let’s defederate them”. If you can provide examples I’m happy to look into it and change my mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Controversial - the place to discuss controversial topics

!controversial@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Controversial - the community to discuss controversial topics.

Challenge others opinions and be challenged on your own.

This is not a safe space nor an echo-chamber, you come here to discuss in a civilized way, no flaming, no insults!

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, “trust me bro” is not a valid argument.

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 6

    Posts

  • 409

    Comments

Community moderators