Comment by wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one on The New York Times tried to block the Internet Archive: another reason to value the latter

… What? No, if you need to edit poor wording you add a note establishing that the editor missed a section of poor wording, and that section has been revised.

You want to do stealth edits? We call those first drafts, and they arent published. Want to hide your edit history? Edit before you post.

People can make mistakes and miss things you know.

And there is nothing wrong with that, nor is there anything wrong in admitting your mistakes

Never have I ever seen a more poignant response.

Nothing wrong with admitting your mistakes, but also seems to me that you should be able to fix them without publicly announcing it.

Not in the news world. Corrections need to be made so people don’t go around spewing nonsense.

EDIT: And those corrections need to be bold and assert themselves. You can’t simply change your words and expect people to find the corrections themselves. That is too much work for the reader, and stating corrections is VERY easy for the publisher.

This. My national news agency publishes corrections like in ye olden days with ye olde telex: separate issue

example would be:

CORRECTION - President denounces war in Israel

BULLETIN - President denounces war in Isral

listed separately, added in their own archives etc.

also seems to me that you should be able to fix them without publicly announcing it.

You would seem to be wrong then lol. News has standards higher than Uncle Joe’s Truckin’ Blog™ or someone’s Aunt’s Facebook post.

There is no whiteout.

You will strike thru the error using a single line, leaving the error legible. Then amend the document with the valid information and initial the change as authorized.

You then submit the new draft, with visible corrections, to be published.

That’s exactly how they taught us in nursing school. If you try and hide the mistake by “scratching” it out, it’s assumed that you’re hiding something. A single strike thru with an initial; owning your mistake. Mistakes are expected, and so is being honest about it. Makes you think twice before writing anything half-assed

Granted, most of us don’t do paper-charting anymore; but the EMR still tracks any addendum. Don’t go writing bullshit that you’re unable to explain

Same with engineering type courses too. And all my science labs. And any contracts job forms etc. I’m constantly trying to get apprentices to break the habit of scratching things out. We dont destroy information. What if you were wrong about being wrong? And write units for things and not just numbers dammit.

Its the New York Times not someones personal blog. If they are publishing sloppy work that is their fault.

And if you do, you make the edit and add your edit note.

You should ad an edit to this comment:
Like this:

Edit:

~~People can make mistakes and miss things you know.~~

This is an example where I am objectively wrong and I apologize.

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

💰 Please help cover server costs.

The New York Times tried to block the Internet Archive: another reason to value the latter(walledculture.org)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

Community stats

Community moderators