My first language was Racket and so naturally I gravitated to the lispy untyped functional programming style even when I was using languages like Python or Java, but when I tried Haskell for the first time my mind was absolutely blown and I was a convert ever since. What are your thoughts?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point

I also started my FP journey with untyped languages. Finding Haskell changed my perspective because it answered questions I hadn’t yet been able to clearly articulate to myself.

That said, I do sympathize with the criticism that static types can make some things harder to use. I think it’s because we’re not yet doing everything right, but the reality is that some, say, Python APIs are faster to get going with than comparable things in Haskell.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

On a side note, the book “Functional Programming in C#” has good sideline explanations for what one is missing out on by using a type system that was designed for OO instead of FP.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 13

    Monthly active users

  • 44

    Posts

  • 86

    Comments