You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-8 points

Hunting has no place in a modern society. When you can choose and choose to hunt and eat meat, you’re the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t totally disagree with you, if that means anything. I don’t get any personal satisfaction from it, but I don’t feel bad about it either. Animals eat animals.

People can choose to not eat animal products, and I can admire that. I try to progressively reduce my use of them too. But we’re both doing things to actively try to do something better for the world and ourselves, which is more than many will bother to do. Even if we don’t agree on some things, we’re both doing what we feel is making a better and informed choice. You don’t have to agree with me, but I don’t feel there’s either side that can claim a moral superiority based solely on what’s on our plates. I’m sure you could find someone who’d claim they’re “more vegan” then you or some other gatekeeping nonsense like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I disagree. There is a morally correct choice here. Animals feel pain, experience grief, play and form bonds. They don’t exist as some sort of resource, but people think of them as such. To willingly inflict suffering and pain on these creatures is wrong. Full stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Again, I don’t disagree with you. But no food supply chain has zero cost to animals. Land is cleared to farm. “Pest animals” and insects are killed to protect yields. Animals are killed or burned by pesticides, rodenticides, and fertilizers. More animals and insects killed at storage facilities. Pollution from transport. Waste from scrapping “ugly” produce. There is still a cost, and you can’t quantify what it is.

I get about 2/3 of my annual meat from a single deer, with no waste, no pollution, and no further cost to the environment and it leaves more food through the winter for the other deer. During the rest of the year, I supply them with essential mineral supplements so they stay healthy.

If you want to judge my decisions, you’re free to. But to think you still don’t require any sacrifice from animals is a bit naive, and if you have a pet, I find that mildly hypocritical. But you do you. We’re allowed to be different and have different values and beliefs. I’m not here to force mine on you or anyone else.

But we should probably leave this chat here. We’re kinda off topic, and I dont want us to get mad with each other. Keep doing your best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s only true if there are enough carnivores like wolves and bears around. If not: goodbye forests. Hunting is pest control.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is not proven at all. It’s at best controversal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Its pretty proven at a 5th grade reading level of study, and even more proven with every grade up.

Its actually kind if hard to find a more proven aspect of biology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s very much proven in some ecosystems where humans introduced new animals, which ate all the plants and caused tons of new erosion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No it isn’t. This is the noble excuse hunters came up with to justify murder.

Nature has this funny way of balancing itself out. Humans are unique in that we somehow view ourselves as above that rule. But as you’ll see in the coming years we’re at the mercy of that equilibrium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Right, all those noble ecologists who spent decades studying this just decided to fake their results cause they get so horny over killing.

Nature balances out over a couple thousand years. What you are asking for is to speed up the current extinction event.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I mean, if there has been a forest somewhere for the last 100 years, chances are there are enough carnivores anyways. Nature finds its balance, hunting only adds chaos to the equation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Wolves had been extinct in western Europe for hundreds of years, only slowly spreading again after the fall of the Iron Curtain 30-something years ago. And, consequently, the hunting quotas for deer are being lowered.

The chaos caused by eliminating wolves is slowly getting back to balance.

By the way: a 100 year old forest is in its early childhood. Hasn’t even reached puberty yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You really need to go outside more. Modern society isnt some state of transcendance beyond nature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I don’t think we’re beyond nature, but as it stands we certainly aren’t acting within it. We aren’t cavemen. We don’t have to hunt our food. We know the impact we have on nature, and more importantly how to lessen that impact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We are nature. You need to stop pretending we are magically no longer living things just because you realized other living things are also alive.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Green - An environmentalist community

!green@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

Community stats

  • 58

    Monthly active users

  • 610

    Posts

  • 2.6K

    Comments