cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/782360

Original link to Gizmodo: Spielberg and Scorsese May Have Just Saved TCM From Zaslav’s Destructive Warpath

Directors Martin Scorsese (L) and Steven Spielberg attend the 12th Annual AFI Awards held at the Four Seasons Hotel Los Angeles at Beverly Hills on January 13, 2012

Martin Scorsese and Steven Spielberg, along with Paul Thomas Anderson, will now be part-time stewards of Turner Classic Movies alongside Warner Bros. film execs Mike De Luca and Pam Abdy. Photo: Frazer Harrison (Getty Images)

Cinephile’s cherished Turner Classic Movies was slated to be Warner Bros. Discovery’s latest amputation of beloved content. Out of the blue, famed directors Steven Spielberg, Martin Scorsese, and Paul Thomas Anderson stepped up to bat for the classic cinema channel. Now it seems the three have managed to hold Warner Bros. CEO David Zaslav back, so long as they stay on to curate and promote TCM content.

According to Variety, the three famed directors will now be the public curators of TCM. In addition, Charles Tabesh—the longtime executive in charge of TCM’s programming lineup—will stay on after initial reports claimed he would get the boot. He will now be reporting to Mike De Luca and Pam Abdy, dual CEOs of Warner Bros. Film Group.

In a joint statement, Spielberg, Scorsese, and Andersen said they are already working with De Luca and Abdy. They also dropped a tithe at grand lord Zaslav’s feet, saying that this arrangement reflects the CEO’s “commitment to honoring the TCM legacy while also involving us on curation and programming.” The three said that the whole team is going to work on “preserving TCM’s mission of celebrating our rich movie history while at the same time ensuring that future generations of filmmakers and film lovers have TCM as a valuable resource.”

The two Film Group execs alongside the directors will all share in the curation duties. In that shared statement, De Luca and Abdy said they intend to “enhance TCM’s on-air programming.” There are very few content streams that try to curate and collect classic cinema. There’s Gizmodo’s own pick The Criterion Channel, but TCM streaming on Max is also a strong source for looking at the films of yesteryear. Without defunct services like Filmstruck, there truly are limited options for cinephiles who lack a large video collection.

Apparently, it takes three Hollywood heavy hitters to stymie Zaslav’s post-merger cost-cutting crusade. IndieWire first reported last week that the directors scheduled an emergency call with Zaslav to contest the layoffs and lead the charge for TCM’s future. The three originally claimed they had been “encouraged” by those discussions, but as is always the case in Hollywood, good feelings don’t necessarily result in positive outcomes. In this case, it seems that clout has won out.

Zaslav’s tenure has seen massive disruptions for Warner Bros. Discovery’s massive content slate. There was the Batgirl movie debacle, major cuts to the company’s animated content, not to mention the controversial move to combine HBO and Discovery content into one streaming service called “Max.” Despite becoming the de-facto antagonist to writers and fans alike, Variety reported Wednesday that Zaslav has been invited to join the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences. Welcome to the big time, Zaz.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point

While I’m not entirely convinced that Zazlav won’t eventually get rid of TCM eventually it’s good to see him held back momentarily by directors who do care at least out of fear of bad PR.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

It’s inexplicable how, thanks to the merger, WB Discovery now has control of this entire vast library with a delivery method already in place and would even consider shutting it down. Is TCM that big (if at all) a money pit? I wouldn’t think so: it’s got to be in the realm of reality show/talk show budget, all rights holder monies aside.

permalink
report
parent
reply

MovieSnob

!moviesnob@lemmy.film

Create post

A community to discuss, debate, and celebrate the history of cinema, emphasis on—but not exclusively—the groundbreaking, avant garde and experimental, with a healthy dose of irreverence instead of the usual navel-gazing that usually surrounds cineastic appreciation.


Community Rules
  1. “All is fair in love and war” but keep it witty or, at minimum, intelligent. If you can’t do either, keep walking. This community’s administrators will not abide simpletons nor bullies.

  2. “Franchise picture” fans and similar ilk, be forewarned: you are open game to be verbally flayed in this public square. Did you not see the name of this community?

  3. There may will be occasionally adult subject matter (NSFW)—such is the nature of the beast. While it is not the scope of this community to purvey nor condone extreme or gratuitous sex or violence, neither subjects are necessarily condemned when in context with the subject matter at hand. It is also not the scope of this community to discuss only adult themes; how else could one discuss Fleming’s The Wizard of Oz (1939) or Donen/Kelly’s Singing In The Rain (1952)?

  • It is suggested you do not subscribe if you are highly sensitive to either subjects.

  • It is strongly suggested that authors of submitted posts mark NSFW content as such. Err on the side of doubt.

  1. All opinions expressed are strictly of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the moderators of this community nor the administrators of this instance (lemmy.film).

Logrolling

!animation@lemmy.film

!filmsframes@lemmy.world

!filmnoir@lemmy.film

!horrormovies@lemmy.film


Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 61

    Posts

  • 109

    Comments