For people who want news coverage of this, the are articles from the Associated Press and Reuters

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
5 points

Too many undefined asterisks. Everytime they say clean energy im skeptical, like its intentionally distinct from renewable energy. Like natural gas projects with carbon offset schemes, or some bullshit like clean coal again.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

Yeah, it would be better to do nothing! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

As opposed to more fossil fuel projects, yeah.

Looking a bit more into the specific projects though, it looks like there’s no energy generating projects at all here, its all distribution infrastructure, with sprinklings of renewable energy wording because they use powerlines too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Your desperation to be displeased, while oh so edgy and endearing to the ladies, isn’t helpful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Carbon “sequestration”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Clean usually means nuclear is included

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators