You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-36 points

In a republic, representatives in power are elected by the general populace. Their decisions represent the will of the citizenry.

Hamas was freely elected by the people of Gaza in 2006. Their actions did and continue to represent the will of the citizenry. If they didn’t, they would not still be in positions of elected authority.

So, in a war of aggression by a democratic state, voting age adults are just as responsible for the actions of their country as the combatants they indirectly sent to harm others.

Gazan adults are either fighting Hamas, or they support Hamas. And I haven’t read ANYTHING about Gazans against Hamas taking up arms to free their country from that elected group.

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

This is a super simple view of the conflict.

They elected them in 2006. So there hasn’t been an election in almost 20 years.

This is a stupid position to take imo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Germans voted for the Nazi party to take power. And guess what? Germans supported that party, even after that party they chose to put into power suspended elections. If you elect a government that suspends elections, you’re still responsible for electing that government. You put them there: you and your fellow citizens gave consent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yes famously every single german citizen unanimously supported the nazi party from 1933 to 1945.

Have you ever learned about how the Nazis came into power? The cycle that Hitler became Chancellor, they won only 37% of the vote. Before that, it was a meager 18%. One election of 37% was enough for emergency powers to be seized, the reichstag to be burned, and quite simply the ball to be put in motion. I’m sure you would’ve been first in line to protest their actions beyond that point, but it certainly would’ve been quite the challenge to change the course after that point.

If you’re cool damning an entire population off the decision of 37%(of the population that voted), then I guess your reasoning stands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is just straight wrong in so many ways I’m afraid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Funny that you mention it, but do you know why Germans voted for the Nazis, because they were desperate and put into a corner, after the end of the WWI and the Versailles treaty they were so bad economically that people were desperate, and guess what, desperate people choose desperate solutions. So in a way, Hamas is in power thanks to the Israelian policies.

Do you truly believe that if those people were in peace and living comfortably Hamas would have been elected in the first place?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

That means that you are personally liable for the 1 Million dead civilians from our unconstitutional war in the middle east.

Using this logic you are fair game for a terrorist attack, and would deserve it.

50% of the population was not born yet during the most recent election where Hamas gained power (16 years ago)

Stop parroting this bullshit and think for yourself

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

I AM responsible. This is how democracy works. You are responsible for your own governance. Why don’t you think for yourself? You can’t vote for your government to kill others, and take zero responsibility.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

And the people who didn’t vote for the government? People who voted for the opposition but didn’t win, are they innocent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

So edgy. Hand yourself over to Al-Qaeda or ISIS since you are responsible. I will buy your plane ticket for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But America isn’t a democracy, it’s a republic.

And even then, people don’t vote on military decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I somewhat agree on principle but practically speaking we live in very large systems with huge momentum these days, even in America where lots of people are armed and can avoid going to a war they don’t want to, they’re not necessarily going to bust moves against the system itself. If you ask me, the most effective action would simply be to buy your way out and enable mass freedom from such industrial war machines

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Taking your same logic, every citizen of every country is responsible for whatever that country does. That means all of the grievances the people of Gaza have are the responsibility of every citizen of Israel.

Your advocating the doctrine of Total war. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_war

Lots of civilians die in Total war. On both sides. Using this logic everyone’s going to die

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

No, every voting eligible citizen in a democratically elected government is responsible for a war of aggression. They are giving consent to the war of aggression. That is how democracy works: you the citizen decide your own governance, and you are not magically absolved of responsibility for the actions of the government you elected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Okay, by that logic, the vast majority of the people in the Gaza strip are innocent. The last election was in 2004. The vast majority of people in Gaza are under 18.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Technically the most natural state of tribalism and humanity lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

In a republic, representatives in power are elected by the general populace. Their decisions represent the will of the citizenry.

Are you 12?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

No, I am a voter. Do you know how government works? Are you 12?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

There weren’t any elections since Hamas took control of Gaza, they have persecuted and expelled/killed all Fatah representatives.

Maybe before saying something try to educate yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m someone who understands that:

  • Governments aren’t always elected with the support of a majority of voters, or even a plurality.
  • A government does not represent the will of the voters who weren’t on the winning side of the last election
  • A government often doesn’t represent the will of the voters on the winning side either.
  • People vote based on what candidates say they’re going to do, and they have next to no control over what their leaders actually do after they’re elected.

Sounds like you don’t understand those very basic facts. Your opinions are therefore not worth listening to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ya he’s giving off some real Libertarian/FrEe MaRkEt/whatevenistheageofconsent vibes

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Due to the Israeli blockade of goods and travel, these people were happy if they can survive the day to day. let alone fight a regime that even the 4th strongest army in the world is failing to control. But sure, it’s their own fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Hey, you cannot say that here! It doesn’t fit the general narrative. What are you thinking? /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

why are you thinking that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

😂

Name calling. And all of the sudden you’re right! But hey, you forgot “bigot” from your answer, we all know you’re not truly right until you call me a bigot!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

50% of the population of Gaza is 15 or lower. The majority of the people there never voted for Hamas.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 269K

    Comments