You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
18 points

One word.

Tories.

That is all.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

The HS2 company was set up under Labour. I watched a bit if the video, interesting content, though I found the presentation pretty insufferable

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

New Labour*. They dropped the New almost immediately and for a while recently it looked like they might drop it in spirit as well, but apparently not. Their current figurehead is a literal knight of the realm. Not necessarily a conflict of interest, but, well, have you seen him?

Anyway, the purpose of projects like HS2 is to get as much money out of the public purse and into the pockets of politician’s pals as quickly as possible, Labour, Tory or otherwise. If something comes out of it that’s actually useful at the end of it all, well, maybe it’ll garner a few more votes in future? Who cares when you’ve got huge piles of money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So, to summarise ’politicians, amirite?’

I suspect thing are a bit more complicated than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So tell me you don’t understand without saying you don’t understand.

The HS2 act, which effectively set the costs (known, unknown and unknowable) was passed by a Tory government desperate not to upset their financial backers in the Home Counties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hello up there on your high horse - I specifically said the HS 2 company.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United Kingdom

!unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create post

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.9K

    Posts

  • 19K

    Comments