Of course they did. If you’re rich, you get a bailout. If you’re not, then fuck you.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
3 points

I think the point is that any type of relief of these kinds of debt would be met with political opposition. The opposition to this is against helping people in any capacity at all, engaging with nitty gritty details as to what might have been more sensible is giving credence to their insanity. When someone is trying to hurt you, you don’t let them ratchet it up to normalize “well, at least they only hurt me this much”. It’s painfully obvious that we have an entire political party in the US that has popularized suffering as the end goal. Nothing less.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Relief should have been cut and dry legal. The government has broad, almost unlimited powers to tax and spend. Idk how they blocked this to be honest. It can’t have been justified.

permalink
report
parent
reply

U.S. News

!usnews@beehaw.org

Create post

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what’s functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Post the original source of information as the link.
  • If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
  • Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
  • Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 476

    Monthly active users

  • 899

    Posts

  • 3.7K

    Comments