You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

I agree with you. I just take it a step further and state there should be no cops at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So who should enforce the law?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Fuck the laws someone should be out there enforcing our rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Dude, their existence prevents the meaningful enforcement of the law. Literally anyone else could do a better job than some thug caste which only pretends to enforce law but doesn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You haven’t answered the question. Who should enforce the law? I’m not sure if you have a problem with the concept of police or with the implementation thereof.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Let’s take the thought a step further and ask; who’s existence wouldn’t prevent the meaningful enforcement of the law?

IMO police, or something to that nature, are pretty necessary in today’s society, but the boundaries they have, are stepped over time and time again, without the proper repercussions.

What’s your take?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No! Jesus Christ! No! Are you insane!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I’m just gonna play devil’s advocate here.

Before the invention of the police, communities took it upon themselves to enforce the law. Oftentimes, militia members would directly write to governors asking for arms, and would also be present in their communities during public events where an armed presence might be necessary. Arrests for members of the community would happen by way of court order first, and then a posse would be formed as a means to enact that court order. Nowhere in the US constitution does the word “police” appear because the idea hadn’t even been conceived at the time of foundation.

Comparatively, today’s police have far more authority to enact violence and effect arrests than even the courts. Could a court today order a dog to maul a surrendering man? Probably not. But when the police do it, apparently, that’s just the cost of doing business.

I think the lie is that we need the police and not the other way around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We need a complete overhaul of society and an educated population to help reduce the incentive to commit crime in the first place, then use the wonders of the high technology we have to make investigating crimes easier for everybody so we can go back to taking control of our own streets again.

It’d take a lot of work to do it, but it’s better than submitting to actual fucking fascism and tyranny because we convince ourselves we’re not capable and need others to do the job of protecting each other for us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If there would be no cops, everybody would just adhere to the laws, duh!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just like the magical free market for businesses. Just trust them!

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments