You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

That was so much my experience working with enthusiastic vim fanboys - they kept telling me “look at how awesome vim is, it can now do this!”, and I’d say, “er, yes, Emacs has always had that, I’ve been doing that since 1992”.

They literally never came up with something unique to vim, but that never shook in their firm belief that vim was absolutely the best most powerful editor and Emacs was a joke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

well vim has always started with minimal core

but when subtext popped, there were some stuff, I forgot what, but a few ergonomics ideas (like projectile, multiple-cursors, maybe nicer fuzzy search) that weren’t present in emacs. took a few months for someone to make it happen … and that was it.

emacs can absorb most ideas, unless it’s something that would break the whole architecture

permalink
report
parent
reply

Emacs

!emacs@communick.news

Create post

A community for the timeless and infinitely powerful editor. Want to see what Emacs is capable of?!

Get Emacs

  • Windows
  • Mac OS X
  • GNU/Linux and BSD (Just get it from your distribution’s package manager)

Rules

  1. Posts should be emacs related
  2. Be kind please
  3. Yes, we already know: Google results for “emacs” and “vi” link to each other. We good.

Emacs Resources

Emacs Tutorials

Useful Emacs configuration files and distributions

Quick pain-saver tip

Community stats

  • 18

    Monthly active users

  • 562

    Posts

  • 2.4K

    Comments