You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
50 points
*

I don’t remember the name of the effect, but it seems to happen a lot of times when newer technologies makes things consume less. People end up consuming more, either by increase of size, duration of use of using more of the thing.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

I can confirm. In 2023 despite having LED lightbulbs - we consume 7 more watts per hour per lightbulb than the average lightbulb did in 1546.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The lights back then probably weren’t very bright were they?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

But they used very little electricity, almost none

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

led comes to mind here with this explanation. extremely more efficient then most other light sources. but because it is so efficient we see led being used everywhere. and almost never turned of because people say it barely uses any power. also the operating time is so high that companies purposely put components behind the led that break so they can sell more. (similar what they did to the old light bulb)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

also the operating time is so high that companies purposely put components behind the led that break so they can sell more.

Could you elaborate with more detail, or share some links for articles that describe that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

This isn’t an example of that though, its just a result of deliberately terrible emissions regulation brought on by lobbying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yep, providing exemptions for vehicles under the weight threshold where a commercial driver’s license is required is dumb.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Could you elaborate? Edit: I see, other people mentioned in the thread about the lobbies and efforts to mask emissions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Induced demand. If the option is there people will use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Vacuum cleaners are the classic example, IMO.

When introduced, they were supposed to make cleaning rugs take less time, freeing time and effort for other activities, but instead housewives just cleaned their rugs more often.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Would means rugs are quite a bit cleaner now, so I would say the vacuum did its job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Yes! It’s called Jevons paradox

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thank you!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Wow it is like induced demand but for resources https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 557K

    Comments