You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
30 points

It’s something current federal law does and has done for decades. A person who is involuntarily committed to undergo inpatient treatment at a mental health facility by a court of law is classified as a “prohibited person” and cannot own or have access to firearms.

Source link: https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/are-there-persons-who-cannot-legally-receive-or-possess-firearms-andor-ammunition

The catch is that a person cannot be deprived of any right without due process - typically a literal day in court. Therefore an individual with mental health problems that have not caused enough trouble to land them in front of a judge can’t be declared a prohibited person.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Due process does not always require a hearing before court action. There are emergency injunctions, ex parte protective orders, temporary restraining orders, certain classes of summary process. When a guy owns assault weapons and is hearing voices, due process can wait a couple weeks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I believe you missed my use of the word “typically”.

permalink
report
parent
reply

4chan

!4chan@lemmy.world

Create post

Greentexts, memes, everything 4chan.

Community stats

  • 2.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 236

    Posts

  • 3.9K

    Comments