The original thread is on the devil’s website and I don’t want to direct traffic to it, so here’s a link to the tweet instead:

https://twitter.com/davidfowl/status/1671351948640129024?s=46&t=OEG0fcSTxko2ppiL47BW1Q

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

Performance limits of LINQ…?

You’re getting nearly the same performance out of loopes generated by LINQ as you would normal for loops.

If you’re referring to LINQ and EF Core, you’re generation SQL with it, not running LINQ. And that query generation is incredibly performant these days (I think EF 7 was something like 5% slower than dapper?).

So luckily you can squeeze a ton of performance out of it!

permalink
report
parent
reply

.NET

!dotnet@programming.dev

Create post

Getting started

Useful resources

IDEs and code editors

Tools

Rules

  • Rule 1: Follow Lemmy rules
  • Rule 2: Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
  • Rule 3: No spam of tools/companies/advertisements

Related communities

Wikipedia pages

Community stats

  • 94

    Monthly active users

  • 294

    Posts

  • 292

    Comments