You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-2 points

Driving an X5 is a choice though, and having an unnecessarily large vehicle multiplies the damage when something does go wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

you want to jail everyone who drives an SUV for life?

i mean i fucking hate SUVs and melbourne is absolutely filthy with them - i absolutely think they should have a tax penalty to discourage anyone living there from owning them needlessly, but still - if this is some older farmer who had an unexpected minor stroke and has to wake up to the news he’s killed five people, i’m not going to be standing in the fucking hospital berating him about his choice of car and trying to make him feel like a murderer. that’s absolutely fucking awful.

have some opinions on sensible car regulation, sure, but this is gross. wait until you know what happened before calling for blood for owning a type of car or some shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They should not be driving a large vehicle if they have a medical history precluding them from operating heavy machinery.

The dude was diabetic and had a history of having hypos.

Epileptics don’t drive at night if they can avoid it, because of the flashing lights:

Why was this guy driving (especially such a large vehicle) when his blood sugar was not properly regulated?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

agree completely. that’s fucked. I accept it may not have been malicious but it’s crazy irresponsible.

but that detail came out a day after the guy baying for his blood above, my point was if you have no idea what actually happened, focus on having compassion for people affected, not immediately getting a pitchfork and yelling for “justice”.

that kind of justice… well, it usually isn’t justice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

I think if you choose to do something that puts people at a higher risk than necessary, you should be responsible for the consequences.

If you drink drive and kill someone, you can’t say it was an accident. If you’re doing burnouts in a crowded street and kill someone, you can’t say you didn’t mean it. Same with speeding. Driving a death machine puts us all at a heightened risk, and when things go wrong, there should be consequences.

The people who died in Daylesford definitely had consequences of this drivers choice. Why shouldn’t the driver have consequences?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Generally you don’t prosecute someone who had a medical issue while driving regardless of how large their vehicle is.

What an utterly insane take you got here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Australia

!australia@aussie.zone

Create post

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you’re posting anything related to:

If you’re posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

  • When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn’t show Lemmy Moderators, I’ll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments