You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments 8 points
He ought to have sparked a constitutional crisis and refused to say it. Then he should have devolved the government.
6 points
2 points
4 points
4 points
1 point
*
2 points
*
Yes, I can understand that, but he’s been a lead voice on the environment a lot longer than most. I guess he’s swapped his beliefs & scruples for the trappings of monarchy, and that diminishes him rather than elivates him in my eyes.
2 points
5 points
I mean he’s 70-odd and has basically been powerless his whole life, if the options are to rock the boat or kick the can down the road and live out his last decade or two doing bugger-all in unimaginable opulence, I can see why he’d pick the latter.
Like it’s not necessarily the morally right option, but I get it.
2 points
1 point
2 points
