1

[Dale Johnson] Panel says Newcastle goal vs. Arsenal correct(www.espn.com)

posted
by
Avatar
SamuraiiChampluu@alien.topB
in
Avatar
main@soccer.forum
323 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
forestation@alien.topB
1 point

That’s not what it says. 2 out of 5 thought it didn’t rise to the level of requiring VAR intervention, meaning they thought it plausible that some refs might deem it to only be a yellow.

In other words, they (2 out of 5) believed there was a gray area, unlike the many redditors who are 100% sure of all their opinions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
TheDarkness1227@alien.topB
1 point

Violent conduct

Ref didn’t see it let alone give a foul let alone give a yellow

Yet 2/5 thought var shouldn’t get involved.

Hard to accept that they’re doing this in good faith.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
PhriendlyPhantom@alien.topB
1 point

The ref didn’t see it at all. Isn’t that a clear & obvious error?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
TZMouk@alien.topB
1 point

I don’t even think it falls in to the “error” category. Given how late it was we can’t expect the ref to see it. It’s surely one of the very things VAR was intended for, off the ball collisions that the referee doesn’t see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
crispysnails@alien.topB
1 point

but the ref missed it and did not even call a foul. VAR got involved because it was clear something happened as the Arsenal player was on the floor and then VAR just did nothing either.

The fact the ref missed it makes it a clear and obvious error surely.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

!main@soccer.forum

Create post

Community stats

  • 15

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 46K

    Comments

Community moderators