A pretty comprehensive video by Hugh Jeffreys covering how Apple has been restricting repairability in their devices, even before 2012.

P.S. Apple’s iPhones may be exempt from California’s R2R bill, apparently they slipped an exemption in there for “waterproof portable devices” 🤦‍♂️

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
4 points

OP, can you share more information? I’m looking at the bill and by means of searching do not find mention of waterproof. Thanks!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’m assuming it’s buried somewhere, this is the exemption that I believe is related:

Equipment or repair parts as defined in Chapter 28 (commencing with Section 22900) of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=BPC&division=8.&title=&part=&chapter=28.&article=

This very loosely defines industrial/special equipment - I can imagine it would be very easy to a lawyer to make the statement that a waterproof iPhone can fit that category. Something like a Panasonic Toughbook would very easily, and it isn’t too far off from an iPhone as far as capabilities and ingress protection are concerned

There are some other ongoing discussions online that are more informed on this issue than I am though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Right to Repair

!right2repair@discuss.tchncs.de

Create post

Whether it be electronics, automobiles or medical equipment, the manufacturers should not be able to horde “oem” parts, render your stuff useless if you repair it with aftermarket parts, or hide schematics of their products.

Summary article from I Fix It

Summary video by Marques Brownlee

Great channel covering and advocating right to repair, Lewis Rossman

Community stats

  • 206

    Monthly active users

  • 56

    Posts

  • 706

    Comments

Community moderators