You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

@zephyreks You could only be seriously confused about where I get my “impression” from if you’re an absolute idiot considering I included the link to the BBC article where I got that “impression”.

Yeah, we agree that it was not collected. But, you keep leaving out the part about where they tried. Make sure you put that in your talking points next time. They tried but failed. Ergo, they did not collect any intelligence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Nowhere in the article does it say that they tried.

I’m like legitimately worried for you. Lead contamination is a serious problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

@zephyreks Here’s another one for you then. See if you can comprehend what Brigadere General Pat Ryder is saying…

"Ryder was asked Thursday whether he believes those U.S. mitigation efforts were responsible for the balloon’s failure to gather any info.

“Certainly, the efforts that we made contributed,” he said."

https://abcnews.go.com/US/chinese-spy-balloon-american-made-parts-transmit-data/story?id=100476856

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Last I checked, the Pentagon falls higher on the scale of “reliable statements by government” than some random General.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 124K

    Comments