Right now, I am in the process of redesigning my network and I had the Idea to connect my two main switches and my FW with a ring like topology. I know that in a typical home network with a 50/10 WAN connection this is absolutely unnecessary. I want to do this anyway, for learning and bragging purpose.
Assuming that I have several VLANs and on each switch at least one device in each VLAN. All Connections between the two switches and the FW are trunk routes for all VLANs. The Omada Controller is running virtualized on a server connected to one of the switches.
My Goal is to distribute traffic over all connections to avoid bottlenecks. I don’t want traffic for devices within the same subnet to flow through FW and I don’t want Internet traffic flow through the connection between switches.
I first read the LACP documentation for omada and OPNsense, but it is mostly intended for two or more lines between two devices and not for a ring topology like I want.
I then read the ®STP documentation and couldn’t find an option that doesn’t simply cut one connection, but “directs” traffic base on the shortest route.
Did I miss something in the documentation, should I look at another protocol/option, or is this something prosumer hardware like I use simply isn’t capable of?
LAG only works well when there is a sufficient diversity of traffic flows that can be distributed equitably across the child links. Since many LAG implementations hash only on MAC and/or IP addresses, the distribution can often be poor when there are only a few clients, as is often the case in a home network. This can possibly be finessed by careful assignment of IP addresses, but the point is LAG doesn’t guarantee access to the entire aggregate throughput of the child links.
For this reason, I believe LAG is seldom worthwhile in a home network.
