You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
8 points

Wouldn’t it be easier to collide more massive particles at some point, instead of building such a huge collider?

permalink
report
reply
25 points

But how would you accelerate to near-speed-of-light speed an ever bigger mass?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

RNAi is asking a leading question, the answer to which is “build a larger collider”

personally I won’t be satisfied until we build the full orbit collider from Xenoblade

permalink
report
parent
reply

it’s about energy right? pretty sure there’s less energy in two 0.9999 c protons smashing into each other than there is in two semis with bricks on the gas pedals smashing into each other

permalink
report
parent
reply

Can we also build swords that turn into hot chicks?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

They already collide calcium i believe to get quark plasma. They need to collide electons with positrons for interesting stuff tbh, this is likely shenigans.

The issue is quarks produce tons of garbage, bigger nuclei produce more tons of garbage, but when you get a pile of it you can call it a new state of matter

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Solid, liquid, gas, plasma… and pile of garbage

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If you can describe sufficiently different statistical mechanics ensemble, its a state of matter, them the rules

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science

!science@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to Hexbear’s science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

Community stats

  • 256

    Monthly active users

  • 346

    Posts

  • 2.4K

    Comments